A thought.... provoked by [livejournal.com profile] filklore_on_lj

May. 6th, 2010 10:40 am
fleetfootmike: (Default)
[personal profile] fleetfootmike
What percentage of the folks who don't vote in a supposedly 'sure' seat don't vote because they don't think voting against the clear favourite will make any difference?

What if they all voted?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-06 10:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armb.livejournal.com
> What if they all voted?

Then the ones who didn't bother voting because their preferred candidate was going to get in anyway would all vote too, and it almost certainly still wouldn't make any difference.

I'm going to vote anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-06 10:50 am (UTC)
aunty_marion: (Ai Cthulhu!)
From: [personal profile] aunty_marion
I'm in a split borough, with a fairly sure-seated MP, and have voted tactically.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-06 03:07 pm (UTC)
billroper: (Default)
From: [personal profile] billroper
Then the Chicago Democratic Machine would "find" more votes for the person in the 'sure' seat.

Oh, wait! This is your election we're talking about. :)

(After the last census, I was gerrymandered from a safe Republican district to a safe Democratic district. The old Republican district is now a block away from my home and somewhat less safe than it was. Of course, it's still worth voting in other races, but U.S. House is a joke.)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-07 02:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keristor.livejournal.com
Evidence from Aylesbury:
Name               Party                Votes    %       +/-
David Lidington Conservative            27,736  52.2    +3.8
Steven Lambert  Liberal Democrat        15,118  28.4    -0.4
Kathryn White   Labour                   6,695  12.6    -5.7
Chris Adams     UK Independence Party    3,613   6.8    +2.3

Turnout was up 5.8% at 68.2%, those who gained were the right (Tory and UKIP), LD and UKIP lost share.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-07 08:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] plaid-dragon.livejournal.com
75% turnout. 47.4% tory, 34.1 % liberal, 10.2% labour.

Voting against the clear favourite would have made a difference if they had turned out and voted liberal. If the votes had been split between liberal, labour and others it wouldn't have made any difference. If you assume that the people who don't vote are likely to have a distribution weighted in favour of the underdog, we'd have got the same result with slightly different numbers.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-07 07:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rickbooth.livejournal.com
I keep seeing polls to the effect that if everybody who agrees with "I would vote Liberal if I thought they had a chance" actually did vote Liberal they'd win a clear majority. Hey ho.

I did vote in my safe seat, as I always do, and it made just as much difference as it always has.

Profile

fleetfootmike: (Default)
fleetfootmike

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags