The iPad and why I will be buying one....
Feb. 1st, 2010 09:09 amSo...
It doesn't have Flash. It doesn't have a camera. It doesn't appear to have USB. It doesn't multitask.
And I'll still be buying one. :D
But then, I'm not in the habit of buying things because of what they don't have,
So, why?
Basically, because the potential of what's effectively a multitouch sheet of virtual paper has me drooling in anticipation. If (and I'm sure they will) the world's iPad app devs get their thinking caps on, how's about:
- Virtual control surface for Logic Pro - http://www.folabs.com/ already have their ProRemote working, apparently
- Virtual gameboard - chess, backgammon, Settlers of Cataan
- Virtual RPG combat area - see what these folks did with Microsoft Surface
- Keynote presenter prompter/remote (using the existing iPad Keynote app)
- Digital music stand (with page turn footswitch if someone can figure out how!)
- eBook reader
The possibilities are endless, if you use your imagination....
It doesn't have Flash. It doesn't have a camera. It doesn't appear to have USB. It doesn't multitask.
And I'll still be buying one. :D
But then, I'm not in the habit of buying things because of what they don't have,
So, why?
Basically, because the potential of what's effectively a multitouch sheet of virtual paper has me drooling in anticipation. If (and I'm sure they will) the world's iPad app devs get their thinking caps on, how's about:
- Virtual control surface for Logic Pro - http://www.folabs.com/ already have their ProRemote working, apparently
- Virtual gameboard - chess, backgammon, Settlers of Cataan
- Virtual RPG combat area - see what these folks did with Microsoft Surface
- Keynote presenter prompter/remote (using the existing iPad Keynote app)
- Digital music stand (with page turn footswitch if someone can figure out how!)
- eBook reader
The possibilities are endless, if you use your imagination....
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:17 am (UTC)However, it seems unlikely in the face of our budget. But still - one can appreciate, yes?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:22 am (UTC)I hadn't thought of using it instead of a real board for board games. I can just about see that working. To me it is still just an iPod Touch that won't fit in a pocket though.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:08 pm (UTC)http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/28/its_like_a_tiny_ipad/
:-)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 09:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-03 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:25 am (UTC)<3
Renée (who so would like to have one >;) )
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:27 am (UTC)That would work with other stuff, it shouldn't need to be iPad-specific, and it's such an obvious idea.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 11:05 am (UTC)I'm thinking, sometime in the future, of getting one.
I like my phone for being able to do everything (it runs Windows Mobile), but I'm constantly frustrated by the tiny screen size.
Carrying one of these, with my phone diverted to it over IP, means I'd only use a phone for social outings; for work and other general travelling about I'd take the iPad.
I think I've been waiting for one of these since I first used a Palm Pilot.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 11:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 12:35 pm (UTC)Will look forward to hearing about it, mind :)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 01:38 pm (UTC)It appeals to me more as a sign of what's to come - I think at the moment I'm happy with my go-everywhere iPod Touch, but this next step on the path to the future is still pleasing. This attitude will in no way prevent me from wanting to play with other peoples' iPads, of course!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 07:11 pm (UTC)We want the next version
Date: 2010-02-01 02:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 02:27 pm (UTC)It doesn't have Flash.
Good. The sooner and more horribly Flash dies, the better.
Agreed that “it doesn't have XYZ” are somewhat second-rate complaints. (Some of them might change in future hardware or software versions anyway...)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 03:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 03:57 pm (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRr7N7A4Wc0
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:47 pm (UTC)As it is, it's pretty much a toy - resolution (apparently deliberately) just too low for HD video so as not to undercut the laptop market, and all the omissions you mentioned. Too big and too expensive for an ebook, and not as good a display as the dedicated ebooks *for that purpose*. Not a good web-browsing solution (for 500 bucks at least) - no flash guarantees that. And I just don't understand why it doesn't have a camera - for heavily mobile Skype users, that could have been an *actual application*.
Sure, the faithful will find ways to use a stretched iPod touch, and it will be a fun toy. But genuinely useful?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 10:40 pm (UTC)(The same goes for eBook readers, but if I were to take them places I'd actually want to use them there would also be more chance of theft. Lose one book and the replacement is possibly 10 quid, lose the reader and it's an order of magnitude more. Bring the price down to "throwaway" levels and I'll consider it...)
Now a 'tablet' type display for a PC (of whatever flavour), big enough to actually play board games on (A3 at least), would be useful indeed. And because it would be in the house I'd be willing to pay more. Bring back those computer games built into the table...
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 09:14 am (UTC)I wouldn't buy the iPad for reading ebooks though, I would imagine that would be like reading on a computer screen or the PDA, which is a lot less comfortable on the eyes than e-ink. For me, the e-ink is close enough to reading a real book that I have been known to try to turn the book page.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 10:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 05:23 am (UTC)I was considering one as a more durable notetaker than a laptop for post-grad/med school if I go that route.