fleetfootmike: (Default)
[personal profile] fleetfootmike
[livejournal.com profile] ladyat left her copy here after our BBQ last summer, and (being short of things to read) I picked it up.

I have to say, and I'm aware this may place me in a minority, that I found the author annoying in the extreme, even beyond the fact that he clearly Has Personal Issues with the Catholic church.

Specifically, I find him guilty of being dishonest with the reader: he places you, the reader, in a character's head, and privy to their innermost thoughts, for the duration of a chapter. Right up to the point where they see something horrifying, dramatic, important, at the end of a chapter. At which point he suddenly stops allowing you that insight, for what to my mind is a cheap attempt at suspense, and switches viewpoint character for a dozen pages.

Repeatedly.

To my mind, this is, as I said, being dishonest with the reader: offering something (the intimacy with the character's thoughts), and then taking it away again to play with the reader's emotions.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-07-25 09:46 am (UTC)
tiassa: (Default)
From: [personal profile] tiassa
That was one of the biggest problems I had with the book. I honestly don't understand why it's so popular, as it's not particularly well-written. The idea was kind of interesting, but not enough to carry the book on its own.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-07-25 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mnemozine.livejournal.com
I did not enjoy the "DaVinci Code" as I did his earlier book, "Angels and Demons" which I read first. I only managed a third of Code before reading something more entertaining.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-07-25 07:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danea.livejournal.com
My personal 'must...not...throw...book' moment came after the umpteenth time a main character got lost in reverie during a key plot moment. So lost, in fact, that almost invariably one of the other characters had to draw him/her out of it. Once, ok. Twice, maybe? But good heavens, this happened a ridiculous number of times! ARGH!

(no subject)

Date: 2004-07-26 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allevil.livejournal.com
I just happened to see youe entry on The DaVinci Code and post to agree with you and to let you know there are others who didn't like the book. I don't know why so many people are finding this such a fasinating read, but I found it pretty boring. There was, along with what you described, no character devlopment and too many implausible parts to hold my interest.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-07-28 06:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bassworm.livejournal.com
I thought it was a terrible read, very badly written in the style of a particularly unimaginative twelve year old. Why this is became a best-seller god only knows. Does music chart-style manipulation exist in the publishing world?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-08 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zanda-myrande.livejournal.com
I'd be very surprised if it didn't.

Profile

fleetfootmike: (Default)
fleetfootmike

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags