(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antonia-tiger.livejournal.com
And they have this one as well. (http://www.haynes.co.uk/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/BookFeature_RAFHandbookView?langId=-1&storeId=10001&catalogId=10001)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 10:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keristor.livejournal.com
Both are going on my 'want' list!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fleetfootmike.livejournal.com
Not so much a Spitfire fan, but the Lancaster manual's going on my birthday list.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 12:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antonia-tiger.livejournal.com
It's even possible to buy your own Lancaster (CGI only)

This is likely good enough for the background in a movie (http://www.vanishingpoint.biz/productdetail.asp?productID=1488)

You can get a Spitfire for free (http://www.colacola.se/expo_303.htm).



(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fleetfootmike.livejournal.com
That'll please Peter Jackson, then.

Though I suspect Weta are modelling his.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 02:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antonia-tiger.livejournal.com
The outfit selling that Lancaster model have picked up the distribution rights to a pretty big collection of CGI models, and quite a few look to be very similar to commercial plastic kits. You can see it in some parts being a bit out of proportion, such as the thickness of the framing of a cockpit canopy or gun turret, and a lot of the buildings are straight out of model railway catalogues.

I don't think the Lancaster is one of those models.

But (going by YouTube videos) any film-maker has to compete with computer games these days.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keristor.livejournal.com
For my taste the Spitfire was the most beautiful fighter ever, the proportions are just right. I have a soft spot for the Lancaster at the top of the bomber category, and the Short Sunderland for flying boats.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 02:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antonia-tiger.livejournal.com
I'd have to be crazy to argue with that.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 07:09 pm (UTC)
occams_pyramid: (Default)
From: [personal profile] occams_pyramid
Never mind the look of it, it's the *sound*

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 07:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keristor.livejournal.com
Two of them with Merlins, the other with Pegasus or Hercules engines depending on the mark. Nothing sounds like a Merlin...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 08:03 pm (UTC)
occams_pyramid: (Default)
From: [personal profile] occams_pyramid
s/Nothing/Peter Morwood/

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 08:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fleetfootmike.livejournal.com
And nothing on earth sounds like FOUR Merlins.


(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fleetfootmike.livejournal.com
Agree, re the look of the Spitfire.

But the story behind the Lancs and the men who flew them is what gets to me.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-28 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] willibald.livejournal.com
The Spitfire manual is a common sight in the windows of bookshops around here - not that suprising as the prototype first flew from Eastleigh. they even had (until last year) a Spitfire theme to their Christmas lights.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-05 08:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sunflowerinrain.livejournal.com
happy birthday! (sung with bounce)

Profile

fleetfootmike: (Default)
fleetfootmike

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags