A thought.... provoked by [livejournal.com profile] filklore_on_lj

May. 6th, 2010 10:40 am
fleetfootmike: (Default)
[personal profile] fleetfootmike
What percentage of the folks who don't vote in a supposedly 'sure' seat don't vote because they don't think voting against the clear favourite will make any difference?

What if they all voted?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-06 03:07 pm (UTC)
billroper: (Default)
From: [personal profile] billroper
Then the Chicago Democratic Machine would "find" more votes for the person in the 'sure' seat.

Oh, wait! This is your election we're talking about. :)

(After the last census, I was gerrymandered from a safe Republican district to a safe Democratic district. The old Republican district is now a block away from my home and somewhat less safe than it was. Of course, it's still worth voting in other races, but U.S. House is a joke.)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-06 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antonia-tiger.livejournal.com
We have had some boundary changes in England, which makes prediction a little harder, but we have enough constraints on how the boundary changes are done that gerrymandering isn't an issue, in the way that US maps of district boundaries suggest it is.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-07 08:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] plaid-dragon.livejournal.com
We got moved, apparently to balance population disparities in districts to try to keep the numbers even. What's amusing is some of the candidates haven't worked this out so I have friends who have been leafleted by candidates from both districts.

Profile

fleetfootmike: (Default)
fleetfootmike

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags